Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 01:27

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Silicon Valley's not crying for Musk - Axios
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Super Again: UNC Storms Past Oklahoma in NCAA Regional Finale - 247Sports
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Thank you.
How to take pictures of the Northern Lights with Google Pixel and other Android phones - 9to5Google
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Why is Nickelback known to be a bad band?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Why do people believe that global warming is man made?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Can someone with ADHD describe the feeling of paralysis and how it affects them?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
What’s your idea of the perfect Saturday night?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Israel warns ‘Tehran will burn’ as Netanyahu hints at regime change - Financial Times